Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 06:03:08PM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
>> I had to go hunt around with Dependency Walker to figure out the actual
>> missing DLL the last time I had to deal with this.
> Ahah. Yes, That's exactly what I used a couple of years back on that.
> These errors are hard to track and find.
I feel the pain on this --- indirect dependencies are not well reported
on any platform that I deal with :-(. Still, I'm having a hard time
convincing myself that this patch is a good idea. It seems very likely
that it will break some startup scenarios, and the incremental benefit
in error reporting seems marginal.
regards, tom lane