On Sat, 2004-08-21 at 11:26, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
<snip>
> > No, not at all. A nonfunctional catalog entry gets in the way of the
> > user replacing the function, should he wish to do that.
>
> Yea, but I would call the odds of that "pretty negligible".
What if they're trying to restore backwards compatibility by adding the
function?
Regards,Jeff