Re: postgres uptime
| От | Robert Treat |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: postgres uptime |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1093009599.12331.158.camel@camel обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: postgres uptime (Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: postgres uptime
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 05:41, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > I'd like to see more than one person requesting this (and with solider
> > rationales) before it gets added to TODO. If I wanted to be picky I
> > would suggest that knowledge of the server start time might be useful
> > information to an attacker. It would for instance narrow down the
> > number of possible starting seeds for the postmaster's random number
> > generator.
>
> Good point, however I can add that also the versione engine knowledge
> could be a good start point.
>
I'd offer that given a simple call to version() will give you PostgreSQL
version, cpu architecture, os/distribution information, and the version
of the compiler used, that letting someone know the uptime of the
postmaster would be last on my list of things I would worry about, and
version() is a non-superuser executable function.
If we do add this function, I guarantee you that you'll see it added to
phppgadmin and pgadmin, because it helps make these remote
administration tools more complete.
Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: