Re: apple uses Postgres for RemoteDesktop 2
От
Scott Marlowe
Тема
Re: apple uses Postgres for RemoteDesktop 2
Дата
Msg-id
1092801734.17763.27.camel@localhost.localdomain
Ответ на
apple uses Postgres for RemoteDesktop 2 (David Teran)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
apple uses Postgres for RemoteDesktop 2 David Teran <david.teran@cluster9.com>
Re: apple uses Postgres for RemoteDesktop 2 "Scott Marlowe" <smarlowe@qwest.net>
Re: apple uses Postgres for RemoteDesktop 2 Joel <rees@ddcom.co.jp>
Re: apple uses Postgres for RemoteDesktop 2 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: apple uses Postgres for RemoteDesktop 2 Joel <rees@ddcom.co.jp>
Re: apple uses Postgres for RemoteDesktop 2 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: apple uses Postgres for RemoteDesktop 2 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: apple uses Postgres for RemoteDesktop 2 merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz)
On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 05:22, David Teran wrote: > Hi, > > maybe anyone already knows that Apple is distributing Postgres 7.3.3 > with RemoteDesktop 2. Its located in > /System/Library/CoreServices/RemoteManagement/rmdb.bundle/ > > BUT... they did not do a good job: -their- installation is using the > default port which means: either -their- version works or the one that > the server owner maybe installed on the same server. In our case > neither our Postgres nor the one from RemoteDesktop 2 did start up > because of file conflicts. > > If anyone from the Postgres (or from whereever) team is in contact with > apple about RemoteDesktop and Postgres it would be great it they could > ask apple to change their port, its unbelievable that they did not care > about this problem. Why can't the user and the OS use the same server? I mean what's the reason not to, not the problems one might encounter that could be overcome? It would seem that by having one single server on a machine memory would be more effectively utilized and performance for both should be ok.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления