Re: apple uses Postgres for RemoteDesktop 2

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Scott Marlowe
Тема
Re: apple uses Postgres for RemoteDesktop 2
Дата
Msg-id
1092801734.17763.27.camel@localhost.localdomain
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
apple uses Postgres for RemoteDesktop 2 David Teran <david.teran@cluster9.com>
Re: apple uses Postgres for RemoteDesktop 2 "Scott Marlowe" <smarlowe@qwest.net>
Re: apple uses Postgres for RemoteDesktop 2 Joel <rees@ddcom.co.jp>
Re: apple uses Postgres for RemoteDesktop 2 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: apple uses Postgres for RemoteDesktop 2 Joel <rees@ddcom.co.jp>
Re: apple uses Postgres for RemoteDesktop 2 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: apple uses Postgres for RemoteDesktop 2 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: apple uses Postgres for RemoteDesktop 2 merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz)
On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 05:22, David Teran wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> maybe anyone already knows that Apple is distributing Postgres 7.3.3 
> with RemoteDesktop 2. Its located in 
> /System/Library/CoreServices/RemoteManagement/rmdb.bundle/
> 
> BUT... they did not do a good job: -their- installation is using the 
> default port which means: either -their- version works or the one that 
> the server owner maybe installed on the same server. In our case 
> neither our Postgres nor the one from RemoteDesktop 2 did start up 
> because of file conflicts.
> 
> If anyone from the Postgres (or from whereever) team is in contact with 
> apple about RemoteDesktop and Postgres it would be great it they could 
> ask apple to change their port, its unbelievable that they did not care 
> about this problem.

Why can't the user and the OS use the same server?  I mean what's the
reason not to, not the problems one might encounter that could be
overcome?  It would seem that by having one single server on a machine
memory would be more effectively utilized and performance for both
should be ok.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
От: Scott Marlowe
Дата:
FAQ