Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> I like your wording, but the "that encoding" wasn't clear enough for me,
> so I reworded it to:

>     Allow Unicode escapes, e.g., E'\u####', U&'\####', to represent any
>     character available in the database encoding, even when the database
>     encoding is not UTF-8 (Tom Lane)

How about "to be used for" instead of "to represent"?  "Represent" kind
of sounds like we're using these on output, which we aren't.

            regards, tom lane