On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 00:46, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
>
> By way of contrast, using the *same* procedure (1-11), but generating 2
> logs worth of INSERTS/UPDATES using 10 concurrent process *works fine* -
> e.g :
>
Great...at least we have shown that something works (or can work) and
have begun to isolate the problem whatever it is.
Best Regards, Simon Riggs