Re: are there ways for 'idle timeout'?

On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 10:26, Konstantin Pelepelin wrote:

> The
> > > best solution I see is having an (per session)
> > > idle_transaction_timeout or idle_connection_timeout
> > > setting. But there is no such thing in postgres!
> > > Scanning through list I've not found any workaround.

Have you looked at statement_timeout?
This doesn't do exactly what you want, but is close enough.

If you don't have it at your release, upgrade.

> > Looking into TODO I don't see any plans for it.
> > > Is it too difficult implementing or I've missed
> > > something or are there workarounds?

This might be something you could do...

Best regards, Simon Riggs