Re: getXXX methods
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: getXXX methods |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1089387924.1506.287.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: getXXX methods (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: getXXX methods
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Well, I have an interesting problem... Detecting that a value is greater than MaxLong? If I parse it using Double.parseDouble, and it is greater than LongMax by 1 or so, the value ends up actually being less due to rounding ? Any suggestions? Dave On Thu, 2004-07-08 at 08:11, Dave Cramer wrote: > I think that since the SQL spec is referenced at the end of the JDBC > spec that it has some relevance. I just thought that in absence of a > second, or third opinion this would suggest a course of action? > > Dave > On Thu, 2004-07-08 at 02:50, Kris Jurka wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Dave Cramer wrote: > > > > > Ok, it appears (at least from my understanding) that Kris is correct > > > here. > > > > > > I had a look at the sql2003 proposed spec (ISO/IEC 9075-2:2003(E)), and > > > it states: > > > > Well the SQL spec and the JDBC spec are different things. I was basing > > part of my argument on the SQL spec's logic and extending that to fill in > > the holes in the JDBC spec, but I don't consider this definitive. I still > > feel this is the right thing to do, but I don't want to close off the > > discussion if people feel otherwise. > > > > Kris Jurka > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Dave Cramer 519 939 0336 ICQ # 14675561
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: