Re: Point in Time Recovery
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Point in Time Recovery |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1089283370.17493.348.camel@stromboli обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Point in Time Recovery ("Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2004-07-08 at 07:57, spock@mgnet.de wrote: > On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Simon Riggs wrote: > > > We don't need to mention timelines in the docs, nor do we need to alter > > pg_controldata to display it...just a comment in the code to explain why > > we add a large number to the LogId after each recovery completes. > > I'd disagree on that. Knowing what exactly happens when recovering the > database is a must. It makes people feel more safe about the process. This > is because the software doesn't do things you wouldn't expect. > > On Oracle e.g. you create a new database incarnation when you recover a > database (incomplete). Which means your System Change Number and your Log > Sequence is reset to 0. > Knowing this is crucial because you otherwise would wonder "Why is it > doing that? Is this a bug or a feature?" > OK, will do. Best regards, Simon Riggs
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: