Re: Point in Time Recovery
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Point in Time Recovery |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1089143927.17493.158.camel@stromboli обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Point in Time Recovery ("Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: Point in Time Recovery
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 08:38, Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD wrote: > > - by time - but the time stamp on each xlog record only specifies to the > > second, which could easily be 10 or more commits (we hope....) > > > > Should we use a different datatype than time_t for the commit timestamp, > > one that offers more fine grained differentiation between checkpoints? > > Imho seconds is really sufficient. If you know a more precise position > you will probably know it from backend log or an xlog sniffer. With those > you can easily use the TransactionId way. > OK, thanks. I'll just leave the time_t datatype just the way it is. Best Regards, Simon Riggs
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: