Re: lock timeout patch
| От | Robert Treat |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: lock timeout patch |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1088450694.31168.71.camel@camel обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: lock timeout patch (Satoshi Nagayasu <nagayasus@nttdata.co.jp>) |
| Ответы |
Re: lock timeout patch
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 02:16, Satoshi Nagayasu wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > I'd accept a mechanism to enforce a timeout at the lock level if you > > could show me a convincing use-case for lock timeouts instead of > > statement timeouts, but I don't believe there is one. I think this > > proposal is a solution in search of a problem. > > I think statement_timeout and lock_timeout are different. > > If I set statement_timeout to 1000 to detect a lock timeout, > I can't run a query which takes over 1 sec. > > If a lock wait is occured, I want to detect it immediately, > but I still want to run a long-running query. > How is your problem not solved by NOWAIT? http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql-lock.html Robert Treat -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: