Re: function retuning refcursor, order by ignored?
| От | novnov |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: function retuning refcursor, order by ignored? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 10879158.post@talk.nabble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: function retuning refcursor, order by ignored? (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Right...I see I'd left BEGIN; off after the first couple of trys. Thanks Alvaro Herrera-7 wrote: > > novnov escribió: >> >> I have been able to run a test like you have in a query (if that's the >> right >> term), and ORDER BY does work. When trying to run via psql, it fails, I >> can't see what I'm doing wrong. (windows xp, postgres 8.2.0-1) >> >> ups=# select proc_item_list(1,true); >> proc_item_list >> -------------------- >> <unnamed portal 3> >> (1 row) >> >> ups=# fetch all from "<unnamed portal 3>"; >> ERROR: cursor "<unnamed portal 3>" does not exist >> ups=# > > Cursors are closed when transactions finish. Try issuing a BEGIN before > calling the function (and COMMIT after the fetch). > > -- > Alvaro Herrera > http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ > PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/function-retuning-refcursor%2C-order-by-ignored--tf3837519.html#a10879158 Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: