Re: why no answer? [Fwd: backup and restore just with use
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: why no answer? [Fwd: backup and restore just with use |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1087451573.27839.0.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: why no answer? [Fwd: backup and restore just with use ("zuhans@iname.com" <zuhans@iname.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: why no answer? [Fwd: backup and restore just with use
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 23:28, zuhans@iname.com wrote: > hello, > > thank you for your short - but informative - answers! > i don't know why this very very important thing isn't implemented by > the jdbc (and other...) driver. it shouldn't only be managable by > those sitting in front of the machine but also via my program to > handle some critical situation in the way i want it to be done (and if > i hoste my webapp somewhere in another continent, i won't be able to > sit in front of the servers console-screen). > > to recode pg_dump is far off my time and (maybe) skills. why isn't it > implemented for easier access? Well, pg_dump doesn't have to be run on the server, it can be run on a client halfway around the world from the server and work just fine.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: