Re: Improving postgresql.conf

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Scott Marlowe
Тема Re: Improving postgresql.conf
Дата
Msg-id 1086974150.31155.3.camel@localhost.localdomain
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Improving postgresql.conf  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Improving postgresql.conf  (Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 11:02, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Gaetano Mendola wrote:
> [ PGP not available, raw data follows ]
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > 
> > | Gaetano Mendola wrote:
> > |
> > |>Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > |>
> > |> > I understand your points below.  However, the group has weighed in the
> > |> > direction of clearly showing non-default values and not duplicating
> > |> > documentation.  We can change that, but you will need more folks
> > |> > agreeing with your direction.
> > |>
> > |>I don't remember the behaviour but tell me what happen if
> > |>I comment out a value changing the value. Kill UP the postmater.
> > |>Recommenting that value and now re killing the postmaster.
> > |>
> > |>I believe that postmaster will not run with the default value.
> > |>Who will look the configuration file will not understand the right
> > |>reality.
> > |
> > |
> > | If you comment a variable in postgresql.conf, it will use the
> > | default value.
> > 
> > That's not true at least with the version 7.4.2.
> > 
> > Try yourself, I did the experiment changing the cpu_tuple_cost and
> > commenting out the cpu_tuple_cost, after sending the SIGHUP to
> > postmaster the value remain: 0.005 that is not the default value at
> > all.
> 
> Oh, sorry, you are right.  Not sure if this is a bug or not.

This point has come up before, and I think it's intended behavior. 
Stopping and restarting the database will, of course, make it load the
defaults.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Improving postgresql.conf
Следующее
От: Manfred Koizar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Another unpleasant surprise using inheritance