Re: Index oddity
От
Rod Taylor
Тема
Re: Index oddity
Дата
Msg-id
1086811930.2539.90.camel@jester
Ответ на
Index oddity (ken)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Index oddity ken <southerland@samsixedd.com>
Re: Index oddity Rod Taylor <pg@rbt.ca>
Re: Index oddity ken <southerland@samsixedd.com>
Re: Index oddity Rod Taylor <pg@rbt.ca>
Re: Index oddity ken <southerland@samsixedd.com>
Re: Index oddity Rod Taylor <pg@rbt.ca>
Re: Index oddity ken <southerland@samsixedd.com>
Re: Index oddity Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Re: Index oddity Rod Taylor <pg@rbt.ca>
Re: Index oddity Mark Kirkwood <markir@coretech.co.nz>
Re: Index oddity "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: Index oddity Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Index oddity (still) ken <southerland@samsixedd.com>
Re: Index oddity (still) Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
It seems to believe that the number of rows returned for the >49.999 case will be 4 times the number for the >50 case. If that was true, then the sequential scan would be correct. ALTER TABLE
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления