Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
| От | Markus Bertheau |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1086441641.2825.0.camel@teetnang обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? (David Garamond <lists@zara.6.isreserved.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
В Сбт, 05.06.2004, в 10:28, David Garamond пишет: > This probably has been discussed and is probably a very minor point, but > consider how many more years we want to be able to use the <single > digit>.<single digit> major release numbering. > > Assuming 1 year between major releases (7.3.0 -> 7.4.0 = +- 1 year), > then we have 7.5-9.9 = 26 years = up until +- jul 2030. if we skip to > 8.0 now, then we have up until 2023. > > Also we have 1 more chance to skip major number: 8.x -> 9.0. Imagine > what features will there be in 9.0 that is ground-breaking enough. > Because after that, we don't have any more major number to jump into > without going into 2 digits. What's the problem with 7.10? -- Markus Bertheau <twanger@bluetwanger.de>
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: