Re: Possible changes to pg_restore
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Possible changes to pg_restore |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 10854.1264464101@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Possible changes to pg_restore (<hywel@hmallett.co.uk>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Possible changes to pg_restore
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
<hywel@hmallett.co.uk> writes:
> Would it be possible and worthwhile to add functionality to pg_restore so
> that with one switch triggers/indexes/constraints could be ignored, and
> with another switch only triggers/indexes/constraints would be restored?
You should probably go back and look at the archives from the last
go-round on that. I believe it was during the 8.4 devel cycle.
Somebody (might have been Simon, but not sure) submitted a patch for
three-part output from pg_dump, it was discussed and sent back for
revision, and the revision never materialized :-(. But IIRC there
was reasonably clear consensus on what the feature ought to look like.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: