Re: SQLState
От | Neil Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SQLState |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1084330589.23490.24.camel@tokyo обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | SQLState ("Mahesh Swamy" <maheshs@fast.fujitsu.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: SQLState
Re: SQLState |
Список | pgsql-patches |
On Tue, 2004-05-11 at 22:07, Mahesh Swamy wrote: > 1/ Is there a convention for creating sub-class codes. The only convention I can see is that subclass values not defined by the SQL specification begin with 'P'. (This ought to be documented; barring any objections, I'll commit a patch stating this in errcodes.h explicitly). Beyond that I don't know of any other conventions. > 2/ If there is no convention is it ok to use the letter 'x' for all our > State codes? Why would you want to do that? > 2/ If we have some States that might become common to the code in > future releases, can we give them in as patches? What's the value in keeping these the same? (If a client is already looking for a specific error code, it doesn't seem too onerous for them to need to look for two.) -Neil
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: