Re: Same query, same performance

Tomasz,

>>1) !       1.185424 elapsed 1.090000 user 0.100000 system sec
>>2) !       1.184415 elapsed 1.070000 user 0.120000 system sec
>>3) !       1.185209 elapsed 1.100000 user 0.080000 system sec
>>
>>If the disks is not read directly, the system must find
>>the rows in RAM. If it find in RAM, why so diffrents machines
>>have the times of execution and why the times does not down ???
>
> Here is your problem:
> ->  Seq Scan on fn06t t1  (cost=0.00..25808.30 rows=15 width=95)
>                Filter: ((fn06emp07 = 1::smallint) AND (fn06tiptit =
> 'R'::bpchar) AND (fn06titban = '002021001525
>   '::bpchar))

Really! I do not attemp that fn06t does not have an index
with fn06titban ... :)

Now, tehe time of the querys are < 0.02 sec on P4
and <0.05 on Xeon.

Very Thank´s

Alexandre,