Re: [Patch] Log10 and hyperbolic functions for SQL:2016 compliance

=?UTF-8?Q?L=C3=A6titia_Avrot?= <laetitia.avrot@gmail.com> writes:
> So, as you're asking that too, maybe my reasons weren't good enough. You'll
> find enclosed a new version of the patch
> with asinh, acosh and atanh (v5).

Pushed with some minor adjustments (mainly cleanup of the error handling).

> Then I tried for several days to implement the 6 last hyperbolic functions,
> but I wasn't satisfied with the result, so I just dropped it.

Yeah, I agree that sech() and so on are not worth the trouble.  If they
were commonly used, they'd be in POSIX ...

            regards, tom lane