Re: PostgreSQL pre-fork speedup

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Rod Taylor
Тема
Re: PostgreSQL pre-fork speedup
Дата
в 19:41:49
Msg-id
1083795123.60668.49.camel@jester
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
PostgreSQL pre-fork speedup sdv mailer <sdvmailer@yahoo.com>
Re: PostgreSQL pre-fork speedup Paul Ramsey <pramsey@refractions.net>
Re: PostgreSQL pre-fork speedup Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: PostgreSQL pre-fork speedup sdv mailer <sdvmailer@yahoo.com>
Re: PostgreSQL pre-fork speedup Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>
Re: PostgreSQL pre-fork speedup sdv mailer <sdvmailer@yahoo.com>
Re: PostgreSQL pre-fork speedup Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
Re: PostgreSQL pre-fork speedup sdv mailer <sdvmailer@yahoo.com>
Re: PostgreSQL pre-fork speedup Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
> And, of course, most development environments (perl, php, java etc)
> have their own language specific connection pooling solutions.

Yes, the one for php is what I was thinking of when I made my statement.
They work on a per backend basis as Apache does not allow for the type
of communication between processes that would otherwise be required. A
connection created by Apache backend A cannot be used by Apache backend
B.

Java is an example where it is done well, but the language decision was
made long before I joined the firm.

I cannot tell if mod_pg_pool works across Apache forked backends or is
still bound to a single process. They state it is intended for sharing
connections across modules, so it is probably still backend specific.


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Doug McNaught
Дата:
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Multiple Xids in PGPROC?
FAQ