Re: new aggregate functions v2
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: new aggregate functions v2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1083779141.14697.493.camel@camel обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: new aggregate functions v2 (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>) |
Список | pgsql-patches |
On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 02:59, Fabien COELHO wrote: > > Dear Robert, > > > > (1) boolean-and and boolean-or aggregates named bool_and and bool_or. > > > they should correspond to standard sql every and some/any aggregates. > > > > Just a minor nibble, but could you add something to the documentation > > entries that these are postgresql implementation of the sql > > any/some/every aggregate functions. > > Yep, that can be done. > > > right now we have whole pages devoted to any/some for subqueries and > > arrays, I'd like to give people looking for the sql spec aggregate > > functions at least a chance of finding these. > > Do you mean one or both of the following? > > - add a note in the aggregate doc that they correspond to > EVERY and SOME/ANY standard aggregates. > I meant this one. > - add a note somewhere else, maybe in the doc about arrays or subqueries, > that there are also aggregates with a non standard name. > if so, where precisely should it be put? > It seems that might be a little intrusive wouldn't it? If we can make sure the aggregate functions page gets picked up in the index entry for any/some I think that would be appropriate. Thanks for your efforts. Robert Treat -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: