Re: Multiple Xids in PGPROC?
От | Rod Taylor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Multiple Xids in PGPROC? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1083731423.54823.6.camel@jester обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Multiple Xids in PGPROC? (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: Multiple Xids in PGPROC?
Re: Multiple Xids in PGPROC? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 00:22, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > I hope not, because for many of us there will be as many (if not more) > > subtransactions than standard transactions. > > How can that possibly be true? Every statement executed in postgres is > a "transaction" how many subtransactions are really needed and how can > they be as common as normal transactions? Yup.. And some of us intend on wrapping every single statement in a subtransaction so we can rollback on an error without aborting the main transaction. In fact, I would be surprised if tools like psql went very long without doing the same thing so users can recover from spelling mistakes.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: