Re: Promoting PostgreSQL to the world.
От | Rod Taylor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Promoting PostgreSQL to the world. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1083267853.30065.371.camel@jester обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Promoting PostgreSQL to the world. (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Promoting PostgreSQL to the world.
|
Список | pgsql-www |
> Command Prompt doesn't doesn't have any staff contributing to the public > project. Do we tell them they can't use the name "PostgreSQL"? That is > just an example. There are tons of PostgreSQL usages out there that > have no payback to the community. ConnX and dbexperts are good > examples. If their next release should have several security issues pass through bugtrack, it would be easy to confuse the two products and think that PostgreSQL proper has the problems. So yes, I would argue that Command Prompt should not be distributing a modified PostgreSQL under the PostgreSQL brand name. Calling it Mammoth Database and mentioning that it is based, in part, on PostgreSQL would be more appropriate.
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: