Re: data=writeback
От | Chris |
---|---|
Тема | Re: data=writeback |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1081417469.5037.50.camel@dell обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: data=writeback ("Priem, Alexander" <ap@cict.nl>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
> > > LABEL=/usr/local/pgsql /usr/local/pgsql ext3 > > > noatime,data=writeback 1 2 > > > LABEL=/usr/local/pgsql /usr/local/pgsql/wal ext3 > > > noatime,data=ordered 1 2 > > > > The same label mounted on two different mount points is probably I typo? > > > No, the same label mounted on two different mount points is not a typo. This > is the way it is in my /etc/fstab. > > Note that I did not create this file myself, it was created by the RedHat > Enterprise Linux 3 ES installer. I created different partitions for the data > directory (/usr/local/pgsql) and the wal directory (/usr/local/pgsql/wal) > using the installer and this is how the /etc/fstab file ended up. > > Why, is this bad? They use the same label, but use different mount points? > Can this cause problems? Mmm... how can the mounter distinguish the two partitions? Maybe I'm missing a concept here, but I thought labels must uniquely identify partitions? Seems suspicious to me... Does it work? When you give just "mount" at the command line what output do you get? Bye, Chris.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: