Re: Perpetuating the myth...annoying
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Perpetuating the myth...annoying |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1081260320.31791.33.camel@camel обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Perpetuating the myth...annoying (David Costa <geeks@dotgeek.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Perpetuating the myth...annoying
Re: Perpetuating the myth...annoying |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 04:19, David Costa wrote: > > On Apr 6, 2004, at 1:02 AM, scott.marlowe wrote: > > > > > I think that if we are going to benchmark the two, and I'm all for it, > > we > > should benchmark them running something fairly standard, like the OSDL > > tests. And MySQL should be using innodb tables for everything, since > > postgresql pretty much always carries the load of running mvcc and > > write > > ahead logging and transactions for everything it does. > > > > Let's do it ;) > One potential problem... I don't think that my$ql can actually handle the osdl tests. On the bright side iirc the osdl folks switched to studying postgresql instead of sapdb (aka max$ql) because they could not get the performance they needed from sapdb, so you might be able to do a comparison there. But this has always been a problem with benchmarking my$ql with postgresql... any test complex enough to show off postgresql's capabilities tends to cause my$ql to fall over... not saying you shouldn't do it, just saying finding a good benchmark might be tricky. BTW David, I'm sure you've seen http://www.phpbuilder.com/columns/tim20001112.php3?page=1 right? Robert Treat -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: