Re: [pgsql-www] Collaboration Tool Proposal

On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 15:41, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> >Peter,
> >
> >
> >
> >>So yes, I
> >>think this is a reasonable plan, just don't expect "collaboration" to
> >>suddenly appear out of nowhere.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Yeah.  As my grandfather used to say, "You can lead a horse to water, but you
> >can't make him shrink."  (granddad is under care, now).
> >
> >Everyone:  Further data: if we prefer BugZilla to GForge's lighter-weight bug
> >tracking, it turns out that there is a BZ plug-in for GForge.
> >
> >
>
> Perhaps when BZ supports PG - some progress is being made on that front,
> but it's not a done deal yet.
>

I can't imagine the BZ plugin for Gforge would require you to use a
second database system would it?  Besides which we can always use red
hats bugzilla port if need be.  I know people have a lot of issues with
it, but if it works for a project of red hats size, i think it would
work for us...

Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL