Re: [PATCH] polish the error message of creating proc

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [PATCH] polish the error message of creating proc
Дата
Msg-id 1076108.1663771991@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH] polish the error message of creating proc  (Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [PATCH] polish the error message of creating proc  (Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com> writes:
> I noticed that there are some translations under the backend/po directory,
> can we just change
> msgid "function \"%s\" already exists with same argument types"
> to
> msgid "%s \"%s\" already exists with same argument types" ?

No.  This doesn't satisfy our message translation guidelines [1].
The fact that there are other messages that aren't up to project
standard isn't a license to create more.

More generally: there are probably dozens, if not hundreds, of
messages in the backend that say "function" but nowadays might
also be talking about a procedure.  I'm not sure there's value
in improving just one of them.

I am pretty sure that we made an explicit decision some time back
that it is okay to say "function" when the object could also be
an aggregate or window function.  So you could at least cut this
back to just handling "procedure" and "function".  Or you could
change it to "routine" as Julien suggests, but I think a lot of
people will not think that's an improvement.

            regards, tom lane

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/nls-programmer.html#NLS-GUIDELINES



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ICU for global collation
Следующее
От: "Jonathan S. Katz"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: why can't a table be part of the same publication as its schema