Re: Preventing duplicate vacuums?
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Preventing duplicate vacuums? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1076106724.30335.41.camel@camel обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Preventing duplicate vacuums? (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Preventing duplicate vacuums?
Re: Preventing duplicate vacuums? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 16:51, Josh Berkus wrote: > Tom, > > > Yes we do: there's a lock. > > Sorry, bad test. Forget I said anything. > > Personally, I would like to have the 2nd vacuum error out instead of blocking. > However, I'll bet that a lot of people won't agree with me. > Don't know if I would agree for sure, but i the second vacuum could see that it is being blocked by the current vacuum, exiting out would be a bonus, since in most scenarios you don't need to run that second vacuum so it just ends up wasting resources (or clogging other things up with it lock) Robert Treat -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: