Re: PITR Dead horse?
От | Austin Gonyou |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PITR Dead horse? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1076012126.3139.34.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PITR Dead horse? ("Nicolai Tufar" <ntufar@pisem.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: PITR Dead horse?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 14:00, Nicolai Tufar wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dave Page [mailto:dpage@vale-housing.co.uk] > > My SQL2K servers give me far more sleepless nights than PostgreSQL > ever > > did! > > You bet! I totally agree with you. > Technicians like you, me and most people on this list > Already know that PostgreSQL is stable and reliable. > It is management that needs to be convinced, and for this > we need to have PITR in feature list. > > > Regards, Dave. As previously stated by Bruce I believe, the mindshare department needs some work. For this, the PITR is a necessity, but also when comparing features with other DBs that people and businesses are currently familiar with. -- Austin Gonyou <austin@coremetrics.com> Coremetrics, Inc.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: