Re: Misplaced modifier in Postgresql license
| От | Jeff Davis |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Misplaced modifier in Postgresql license |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1070106961.21501.142.camel@jeff обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Misplaced modifier in Postgresql license (Breen Ouellette <the.man@breeno.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
> "Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its
> documentation for any purpose, WITHOUT FEE, and without a written
> agreement is hereby granted, provided that the above copyright notice
> and this paragraph and the following two paragraphs appear in all
> copies."
My personal interpretation isn't very ambiguous at all. If the license
were interpreted to require that you could not charge to provide someone
with a copy of postgres, that would imply that you aren't allowed to
have a written agreement with them either. That just doesn't make sense
to me.
I can see how a lawyer might tell someone to play it safe though. Also,
I suppose in any disagreement over the ambiguity of a text, the side
perceiving ambiguities is bound to win ;)
regards,
jeff davis
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: