Re: 7.5 Plans
От | Rod Taylor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 7.5 Plans |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1069911387.17262.62.camel@jester обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 7.5 Plans ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: 7.5 Plans
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 23:32, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Rod Taylor wrote: > > > > So, what does changing it to $PostgreSQL$ do? Or am I reading the wrong > > > part of the manual? > > > > After applying the patch in -patches to CVSROOT and running the update > > script... > > > > It will allow Chris and other to import the PostgreSQL source into their > > own CVS tree without having do to a ton of diff editing to reimport / > > export changes between the primary tree and their development tree. > > 'k, but why can't that be accomplished with $Id$? When you import the files into the other CVS system the version and file information $Id$ represents will be replaced by the other system. So, when you diff the original (primary repository) EVERY file will show $Id$ has changed. > Are there any caveats to the change? Ie. if Tom has a checkout and this > change is made, will he have problems committing? $VARIABLE$ is used for informational purposes only AFAIK. There would be no change that I know of. At work I use $InQuent$, FreeBSD of course uses $FreeBSD$ of which other BSDs follow suite $NetBSD$ and $OpenBSD$. I've not heard of any issues with 3rd party CVS clients and any of those repositories in this regard.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: