Re: Comparing databases
От | Rod Taylor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Comparing databases |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1069615107.4494.10.camel@jester обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Comparing databases (Paul Ganainm <paulsnewsgroups@hotmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
> > A good example is our function language support. While most of the databases > > above support some type of procedural language, do any of them support more > > than 10 different types of procedural languages? > Maybe this is a silly question, but do you really need more than 10? > What's the matter with one that does a great job? Aside from languages that excel at certain jobs (plR) it is useful to provide what a shop already knows. Perl shops will prefer perl, PHP shops will prefer php, etc. > > Or do they have an > > extensible enough codebase that can allow people to create their own > > languages, like Joe Conway recently did with plR, or the folks at Command > > Prompt have been doing with plPHP? > I need this explained to me in a bit more detail - URL? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/interactive/sql-createlanguage.html http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/plhandler.html
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: