Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the
| От | Robert Treat |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1069275646.10323.9571.camel@camel обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the (Sailesh Krishnamurthy <sailesh@cs.berkeley.edu>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 10:47, Sailesh Krishnamurthy wrote:
> >>>>> "Mike" == Mike Mascari <mascarm@mascari.com> writes:
>
> Mike> Robert Treat wrote:
>
> >> While some form of bitmapped indexing would be cool, other ideas might
> >> be to implement different buffer manager strategies. I was impressed by
> >> how quickly Jan was able to implement ARC over LRU, but there are a host
> >> of other strategies that could also be implemented.
>
> We already do that !
>
:-)
> We have a first "warm-up" assignment for which they get 2 weeks and
> have to change the strategy to MRU from LRU (in an earlier semester
> they were assigned 2Q). The idea here more to just get used to the
> code and the debugger.
>
It would be cool if some of these were posted to -patches... *in theory*
it would give folks a chance to do real stress testing on different
implementations. if nothing else we could bug Jan some more about making
the buffer management code configurable ;-)
Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: