Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1069275646.10323.9571.camel@camel обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the (Sailesh Krishnamurthy <sailesh@cs.berkeley.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 10:47, Sailesh Krishnamurthy wrote: > >>>>> "Mike" == Mike Mascari <mascarm@mascari.com> writes: > > Mike> Robert Treat wrote: > > >> While some form of bitmapped indexing would be cool, other ideas might > >> be to implement different buffer manager strategies. I was impressed by > >> how quickly Jan was able to implement ARC over LRU, but there are a host > >> of other strategies that could also be implemented. > > We already do that ! > :-) > We have a first "warm-up" assignment for which they get 2 weeks and > have to change the strategy to MRU from LRU (in an earlier semester > they were assigned 2Q). The idea here more to just get used to the > code and the debugger. > It would be cool if some of these were posted to -patches... *in theory* it would give folks a chance to do real stress testing on different implementations. if nothing else we could bug Jan some more about making the buffer management code configurable ;-) Robert Treat -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: