Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] SRA Win32 sync() code
| От | Hannu Krosing |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] SRA Win32 sync() code |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1069064914.20092.41.camel@fuji.krosing.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] SRA Win32 sync() code (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] SRA Win32 sync() code
|
| Список | pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian kirjutas E, 17.11.2003 kell 03:58: > > OK, let me give you my logic and you can tell me where I am wrong. > > First, how many backend can a single write process support if all the > backends are doing insert/update/deletes? 5? 10? Let's assume 10. > Second, once we change write to write/fsync, how much slower will that > be? 100x, 1000x? Let's say 10x. > > So, by my logic, if we have 100 backends all doing updates, we will need > 10 * 100 or 1000 writer processes or threads to keep up with that load. > That seems quite excessive to me from a context switching and process > overhead perspective. > > Where am I wrong? Maybe you meant 100/10 instead of 100*10 ;) ------------ Hannu
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: