Re: Interbase/Firebird - any users out there - what's
От | Franco Bruno Borghesi |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Interbase/Firebird - any users out there - what's |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1068041145.783.10.camel@taz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Interbase/Firebird - any users out there - what's the performance like compared to PostgreSQL? (Paul Ganainm <paulsnewsgroups@hotmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
About a year ago I programmed a php/firebird application, and I've never had a problem with firebird. It's a small database (a few megabytes), but it just works day after day.
I've seen firebird has updatable views, they seem to work very well.
I have the feeling that It's not as flexible as postgresql, but I still like it. It would be my choice for win32 applications (until win32 postgresql port become available).
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 07:28, Paul Ganainm wrote:
I've seen firebird has updatable views, they seem to work very well.
I have the feeling that It's not as flexible as postgresql, but I still like it. It would be my choice for win32 applications (until win32 postgresql port become available).
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 07:28, Paul Ganainm wrote:
Hi all, I have just started with PostgreSQL on Linux and in the past I've done a good bit of work on Interbase (both on Windows and Linux). What I want to know here is What do people here think of Interbase/Firebird? Has anybody done performance metrics or could they point me to a comparison between the two? Does Interbase/Firebird have (as far as people here are concerned) any show-stoppers in terms of functionality which they do have on PostgreSQL? Or, indeed, the other way round? I'm not interested in starting a flame war or anything like that - just a presentation of the facts as you see them, and if you want to put in your opinion also, that's fine, just make a note! TIA. Paul...
Вложения
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: