Re: Cursor based statements ADDENDUM

It appears that this is a 7.4 issues, previous versions used to destroy
a cursor if it existed, 7.4 does not do this.

Dave

On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 16:52, Dave Cramer wrote:
> Just going through the code and the CursorFetchTest fails on the 3rd
> iteration
>
> This is because the code can't deal with changing the fetch size on an
> already declared fetch size.
>
> the question is do we want that ability. the spec of course is
> ambiguous.
>
> Dave
--
Dave Cramer <Dave@micro-automation.net>