Re: multi-backend psql
От | Rod Taylor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: multi-backend psql |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1066705230.63032.85.camel@jester обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: multi-backend psql (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: multi-backend psql
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 22:39, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > The tricky part seems to be dealing with i10n issues since the text to > > translate would be release specific it needs to go into the backend -- > > but that isn't so nice. > > Why tricky? I'm just going to make the 7.5 psql utility work against > previous versions of postgresql. Any strings in that utility are > translatable like any other. I suppose if all you want is backward compatibility which makes sense for pg_dump, but surely psql should be forward thinking. Normally it's old clients with new server, not the other way around -- at least with big companies it seems easier to get a server upgraded than everyones desktop. Forward looking means pulling the available commands, queries, etc from the backend. It actually works quite well (submitted a patch quite a while ago) in all respects except string translation.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: