Re: MySQL interview, no mention of PostgreSQL
От | Jeff Davis |
---|---|
Тема | Re: MySQL interview, no mention of PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1066244385.5882.121.camel@jeff обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: MySQL interview, no mention of PostgreSQL ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 02:47, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Jeff Davis wrote: > > > I bet the win32 port will help advocacy a lot. The other thing that > > would help I think would be to make it as friendly as possible for ISPs > > to do virtual hosting. Schemas are probably helping that a lot already, > > and the only other thing I can think of in that area would be resource > > monitoring/control. I'm not suggesting that MySQL is better for virtual > > hosting, but perhaps if PostgreSQL makes it easier than that will give > > us an edge. > > 'K, I've been doing virtual hosting with PostgreSQL for 8 years now (god, > I feel old) ... what is hard about it? > > In fact, we run MySQL (ack!) for some clients, due to their requirements, > and with the recent changes in our IPs, we're having a bugger of a time > with IP based access and getting those clients switched to the new IPs > then we had with PostgreSQL (MySQL uses an SQL based ACL system for > connections, apparently, vs our 'text based, sed changable pg_hb.conf > file') ... > That's why I said "I'm not suggesting that MySQL is better for virtual hosting...". I've been virtual hosting with PostgreSQL for years also (not 8 years though, that's impressive). I was just kind of thinking out loud. It would be kind of interesting if there were resource controls, but I think that Tom already said that would be too resource-intensive and not worth it (although I don't recall the exact context). Regards, Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: