MySQL interview, no mention of PostgreSQL
От | Jeff Davis |
---|---|
Тема | MySQL interview, no mention of PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1066197543.5868.66.camel@jeff обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: MySQL interview, no mention of PostgreSQL
Re: MySQL interview, no mention of PostgreSQL Re: MySQL interview, no mention of PostgreSQL Re: MySQL interview, no mention of PostgreSQL |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Here's an interview in Linux Magazine that doesn't even mention PostgreSQL. I wouldn't expect the interviewee to mention it, but it's frustrating that the interviewer didn't even bring it up. http://www.linux-mag.com/2003-07/monty_01.html [Note: you have to manually increment the URL to go to the subsequent pages. I didn't see a "next page" link.] The most frustrating thing about it is that the MySQL guy is talking about the big plans for all the new features MySQL will have, and it reads more like PostgreSQL's HISTORY file (note: I stole that analogy from someone else). It would be nice if we had some mindshare among the LAMP crowd. Does anyone think we can convince O'Reilly to change LAMP to squeeze in PostgreSQL? Linux-Apache-MySQL-PostgreSQL-PHP-Python-Perl? I bet the win32 port will help advocacy a lot. The other thing that would help I think would be to make it as friendly as possible for ISPs to do virtual hosting. Schemas are probably helping that a lot already, and the only other thing I can think of in that area would be resource monitoring/control. I'm not suggesting that MySQL is better for virtual hosting, but perhaps if PostgreSQL makes it easier than that will give us an edge. Regards, Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: