Re: Postgres vs. Progress performance
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres vs. Progress performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1064859587.2406.491.camel@camel обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Postgres vs. Progress performance ("John Wells" <jb@sourceillustrated.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres vs. Progress performance
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 12:43, John Wells wrote: > We > average 2.5 million transactions per day or 800 per second. 800*60*60*24 = 69 million per day... are you doing 2.5 million with burst of up to 800 per second? we average around 190 tps, though the high burst i see in the last few seconds is only 270... about 1/3 of those are inserts and/or updates. the box its running on is a dual pentium 1.3ghz with 1GB of RAM. it's not optimal hardware either (only 2 disks for starters), but it runs pretty solidly and the server its on doesn't seem too taxed.. i feel pretty confident that postgresql can handle your workload without much trouble, you just need to give it enough hardware. Robert Treat -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: