Re: Postgres vs. Progress performance

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Treat
Тема Re: Postgres vs. Progress performance
Дата
Msg-id 1064859587.2406.491.camel@camel
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Postgres vs. Progress performance  ("John Wells" <jb@sourceillustrated.com>)
Ответы Re: Postgres vs. Progress performance  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-general
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 12:43, John Wells wrote:
>  We
> average 2.5 million transactions per day or 800 per second.

800*60*60*24 = 69 million per day... are you doing 2.5 million with
burst of up to 800 per second?

we average around 190 tps, though the high burst i see in the last few
seconds is only 270... about 1/3 of those are inserts and/or updates.

the box its running on is a dual pentium 1.3ghz with 1GB of RAM. it's
not optimal hardware either (only 2 disks for starters), but it runs
pretty solidly and the server its on doesn't seem too taxed..

i feel pretty confident that postgresql can handle your workload without
much trouble, you just need to give it enough hardware.

Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "James Moe"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: numeric rounding
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Postgres vs. Progress performance