Re: 2-phase commit
От | Rod Taylor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 2-phase commit |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1064610936.28889.113.camel@jester обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 2-phase commit (Andrew Sullivan <andrew@libertyrms.info>) |
Ответы |
Re: 2-phase commit
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> The first problem is the restart/rejoin problem. When a 2PC member > goes away, it is supposed to come back with all its former locks and > everything in place, so that it can know what to do. This is also > extremely tricky, but I think the answer is sort of easy. A member > which re-joins without crashing (that is, it has open transactions, I think you may be confusing 2PC with replication. PostgreSQLs 2PC implementation should follow enough of the XA rules to play nice in a mixed environment where something else is managing the transactions (application servers are becoming more common all the time). As far as inter-PostgreSQL replication / queries are concerned we can choose whatever semantics we like -- just realize that they are 2 different problems.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: