Re: PL contribution guidelines?
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PL contribution guidelines? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1064520876.17819.2182.camel@camel обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PL contribution guidelines? (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 13:26, Bruce Momjian wrote: > scott.marlowe wrote: > > On 25 Sep 2003, Robert Treat wrote: > > > > > oh.. and i'm not forgetting plphp, but it has both licensing issues and > > > isn't ready for prime time. > > > > I thought there weren't any license issues, except mayhaps with the name. > > > > http://www.php.net/license/3_0.txt > > That is what I thought too. Originally PlPHP was stated as being > released as GPL (which the author thought was used by PHP), but later > corrected to be the BSD license. > The naming issue was the one that had stuck in my head. (Noting that it isn't BSD licensed, it's PHP licensed, which might be a problem for some, but seems fairly BSD compatible). Robert Treat -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: