On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 13:26, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> scott.marlowe wrote:
> > On 25 Sep 2003, Robert Treat wrote:
> >
> > > oh.. and i'm not forgetting plphp, but it has both licensing issues and
> > > isn't ready for prime time.
> >
> > I thought there weren't any license issues, except mayhaps with the name.
> >
> > http://www.php.net/license/3_0.txt
>
> That is what I thought too. Originally PlPHP was stated as being
> released as GPL (which the author thought was used by PHP), but later
> corrected to be the BSD license.
>
The naming issue was the one that had stuck in my head.
(Noting that it isn't BSD licensed, it's PHP licensed, which might be a
problem for some, but seems fairly BSD compatible).
Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL