Andrew Dunstan kirjutas L, 06.09.2003 kell 16:14:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> >Tom Lane writes:
> >
> >
> >
> >>There are good security arguments not to have it in the default install,
> >>no?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >I think last time the only reason we saw was that dump restoring would be
> >difficult. I don't see any security reasons.
> >
>
> That could be overcome by doing a 'drop language' before running your
> restore, couldn't it?
or to have CREATE OR REPLACE LANGUAGE (like we have for FUNCTIONS).
-------------------
Hannu