Re: SELECT's take a long time compared to other DBMS

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Hannu Krosing
Тема Re: SELECT's take a long time compared to other DBMS
Дата
Msg-id 1062673303.5200.135.camel@fuji.krosing.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на SELECT's take a long time compared to other DBMS  ("Relaxin" <me@yourhouse.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
Relaxin kirjutas N, 04.09.2003 kell 03:28:
> I have a table with 102,384 records in it, each record is 934 bytes.

I created a test database on my Linux (RH9) laptop with 30GB/4200RPM ide
drive and P3-1133Mhz, 768MB, populated it with 128000 rows of 930 bytes
each and did

[hannu@fuji hannu]$ time psql test100k -c 'select * from test' >
/dev/null

real    0m3.970s
user    0m0.980s
sys     0m0.570s

so it seems definitely not a problem with postgres as such, but perhaps
with Cygwin and/or ODBC driver

I also ran the same query  using the "standard" pg adapter:

>>> import pg, time
>>>
>>> con = pg.connect('test100k')
>>>
>>> def getall():
...     t1 = time.time()
...     res = con.query('select * from test')
...     t2 = time.time()
...     list = res.getresult()
...     t3 = time.time()
...     print t2 - t1, t3-t2
...
>>> getall()
3.27637195587 1.10105705261
>>> getall()
3.07413101196 0.996125936508
>>> getall()
3.03377199173 1.07322502136

which gave similar results

------------------------------
Hannu




В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Sullivan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Query on Postgresql performance
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL Reliability when fsync = false on Linux-XFS