Re: "truncate all"?
| От | Robert Treat |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: "truncate all"? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1060016013.22273.1812.camel@camel обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: "truncate all"? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: "truncate all"?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 12:19, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > This this a TODO? Keep in mind if we follow the syntax of VACUUM and
> > (7.4) CLUSTER, that the all-database truncate would just be "TRUNACATE".
> > That seems very risky to me. I wonder if the risk is worth adding this
> > feature.
>
> I wouldn't care for that either. The prior suggestion of "TRUNCATE tab
> CASCADE" (to truncate any tables with FK dependencies on the original
> target, instead of failing) seems more reasonable.
>
Actually there seems to be an ancillary issue here:
21809=# truncate exception;
ERROR: TRUNCATE cannot be used as table exception_notice_map references
this one via foreign key constraint $1
21809=# TRUNCATE exception_notice_map ;
TRUNCATE TABLE
21809=# truncate exception;
ERROR: TRUNCATE cannot be used as table exception_notice_map references
this one via foreign key constraint $1
21809=# select count(*) from exception_notice_map;count
------- 0
(1 row)
21809=#
Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: