Re: Bad cast priority for DATE?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Bad cast priority for DATE?
Дата
Msg-id 106.1284770453@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Bad cast priority for DATE?  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Ответы Re: Bad cast priority for DATE?  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> I was noticing that, where we have a function which has two versions,
> timestamp and timestamptz (for example, date_trunc()), if I use a DATE
> timestamptz is the default cast.  Shouldn't timestamp without time zone
> be the default?  Is this something we can fix without an overhaul of the
> type casting system?

timestamptz is a preferred type, so no you probably can't change that
without breaking a lot of stuff.  It's not immediately clear to me why
that's wrong anyway.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Bad cast priority for DATE?
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: VACUUM produces odd freespace values