reg_pg_stefanz@perfexpert.ch writes:
> However, I poked around a little bit, and this does not seem to solve
> all potential use cases, when I modify the simplified test by deferring
> the lookup to be done inside the loop as an extra lookup instead of
> doing it directly in the loop (whether that makes sense is another
> question) , then this still produces the error:
Ugh. Thanks for the test case!
regards, tom lane