Re: Table Partitioning and Rules
От
Rod Taylor
Тема
Re: Table Partitioning and Rules
Дата
Msg-id
1058469725.97321.86.camel@jester
Ответ на
Re: Table Partitioning and Rules (Josh Berkus)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Table Partitioning and Rules "Girish Bajaj" <gbajaj@tietronix.com>
Re: Table Partitioning and Rules Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
Re: Table Partitioning and Rules Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Re: Table Partitioning and Rules "Girish Bajaj" <gbajaj@tietronix.com>
Re: Table Partitioning and Rules Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Re: Table Partitioning and Rules Steve Crawford <scrawford@pinpointresearch.com>
Re: Table Partitioning and Rules Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
Re: Table Partitioning and Rules Dmitry Tkach <dmitry@openratings.com>
Re: Table Partitioning and Rules Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>
Re: Table Partitioning and Rules Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>
On Thu, 2003-07-17 at 19:03, Josh Berkus wrote: > Girish, > > > > Essentially Im trying to store a persons information in a table in the > > > database. Since we could have millions of people, with duplicates! Ive > > > decided we need to partition the table into segments where all people with > > > the LastName starting from A to G will be in one table. H-N will be in > > > another table and O-Z in the third. Ive created a VIEW that does a UNION > on > > > all the tables. > > This sounds hideously inefficient and a management headache besides. I think > PostgreSQL will accept up to 2 billion rows in any one table, and splitting > stuff into 3 tables will not improve your performance ... quite the opposite. PostgreSQL will go well beyond 2 billion rows in a table. It just becomes difficult to use OIDs.
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления