Re: Hardware performance

От: Hannu Krosing
Тема: Re: Hardware performance
Дата: ,
Msg-id: 1058428609.4289.5.camel@fuji.krosing.net
(см: обсуждение, исходный текст)
Ответ на: Re: Hardware performance  (Joe Conway)
Ответы: Re: Hardware performance  (Joe Conway)
Список: pgsql-performance

Скрыть дерево обсуждения

Hardware performance  ("Balazs Wellisch", )
 Re: Hardware performance  ("Roman Fail", )
  Re: Hardware performance  (Ron Johnson, )
 Re: Hardware performance  (Joe Conway, )
  Re: Hardware performance  (Hannu Krosing, )
   Re: Hardware performance  (Joe Conway, )
    Re: Hardware performance  (Adam Witney, )
     Re: Hardware performance  (Joe Conway, )
      Re: Hardware performance  (Adam Witney, )
       Re: Hardware performance  (Joe Conway, )
       Re: Hardware performance  (Jord Tanner, )
       Re: Hardware performance  (Robert Creager, )
    Re: Hardware performance  (Andrew Sullivan, )
 Re: Hardware performance  (Vincent van Leeuwen, )
 Re: Hardware performance  (Jean-Luc Lachance, )
  Re: Hardware performance  (Joe Conway, )
 Re: Hardware performance  (Jean-Luc Lachance, )
 Re: Hardware performance  ("Magnus Hagander", )
  Re: Hardware performance  (Ron Johnson, )
 Re: Hardware performance  ("Magnus Hagander", )

Joe Conway kirjutas N, 17.07.2003 kell 07:52:
> To an extent it depends on how big the drives are and how large you
> expect the database to get. For maximal performance you want RAID 1+0
> for data and WAL; and you want OS, data, and WAL each on their own
> drives. So with 5 drives one possible configuration is:
>
> 1 drive OS: OS on it's own drive makes it easy to upgrade, or restore
> the OS from CD if needed
> 2 drives, RAID 1+0: WAL
> 2 drives, RAID 1+0: data

How do you do RAID 1+0 with just two drives ?

--------------
Hannu




В списке pgsql-performance по дате сообщения:

От: "Shridhar Daithankar"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: index / sequential scan problem
От: Jord Tanner
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: index / sequential scan problem